LEGAL DISCLAIMER & PUBLIC NOTICE
The following information is based solely on publicly available news reports and court records. Readers are encouraged to independently verify records.
https://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/bengaluru/2019/Dec/14/ed-attaches-ambidant-assets-worth-rs-10-crore-2075899.html
1. Ambidant Marketing Case (2018–2019)
In reports concerning the Ambidant Marketing investigation (2018–2019), certain individuals were named in public records during the investigative phase. These proceedings were widely covered by national news agencies, documenting the initial stages of legal scrutiny.
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) reported attachment proceedings as part of a broader lookup into the flow of capital and media-related financial records. Allegations published by mainstream media referenced transactions allegedly connected to communication activities.
Source: New Indian Express report on ED attachment (2019)
EXTERNAL VERIFICATION SOURCES
https://www.legitquest.com/case/vijay-tata-v-state-of-karnataka/11D98A
2. Orange & Granity Properties Matter (2009)
In 2009, public media reports highlighted investor complaints regarding layout project collections near Devanahalli associated with Orange & Granity Properties. The reports detailed concerns about the management of investor funds and the resulting delays in the delivery of the promised development project.
The resulting High Court proceedings were recorded in various news archives, highlighting undertakings for the systematic repayment of installments. This documented history is presented here as part of the public record for transparency and consumer awareness regarding the project's historical legal environment.
EXTERNAL RESOURCES & PROJECT ARCHIVES
New Indian Express report on Orange Properties (2009)
3. 2024–2025 Political Complaint Controversy
H.D. Kumaraswamy calling Tata a "fraudster" and alleging he has been named in over 2,500 FIRs. JDS leaders subsequently demanded an SIT probe into his widespread business activities across multiple states.
Recent public news coverage from late 2024 through early 2025 has referenced various allegations and counter-allegations involving notable political figures and administrative offices. These reports have focused on the discourse surrounding official complaints and regulatory inquiries.
The chronology of statements reported in mainstream newspapers provides a factual overview of the controversy, capturing public responses and the context of subsequent legal developments reported by verified news outlets.
Public News Coverage & Sources
All information in this section reflects publicly reported news matters and mainstream media coverage.